Meet MarketerHire's newest SEO + AEO product

delaPlex isn't optimized for AI search yet.

We audited your search visibility across Perplexity, ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude. delaPlex was cited in 1 of 5 answers. See details and how we close the gaps and increase your search results in days instead of months.

Immediate in-depth auditvs. 8 months at agencies

delaPlex is cited in 1 of 5 buyer-intent queries we ran on Perplexity for "business technology consulting and services." Competitors are winning the unbranded category answers.

Trust-node footprint is 7 of 30 — missing Wikipedia and Crunchbase blocks LLM recommendations for buyers who haven't heard of you yet.

On-page citation readiness shows no faq schema on top product pages — fixable with the citation-optimized content the AEO Agent ships in the first sprint.

AI-Forward Companies Trust MarketerHire

Plaid Plaid
MasterClass MasterClass
Constant Contact Constant Contact
Netflix Netflix
Noom Noom
Tinuiti Tinuiti
30,000+
Matches Made
6,000+
Customers
Since 2019
Track Record

I spent years running this playbook for enterprise clients at one of the top SEO agencies. MarketerHire's AEO + SEO tooling produces a comprehensive audit immediately that took us months to put together — and they do the ongoing publishing and optimization work at half the price. If I were buying this today, I'd buy it here.

— Marketing leader, formerly at a top SEO growth agency

AI Search Audit

Here's Where You Stand in AI Search

A real audit. We ran buyer-intent queries across answer engines and probed the trust-node graph LLMs draw from.

Sample mini-audit only. The full audit goes 12 sections deep (technical SEO, content ecosystem, schema, AI readiness, competitor gap, 30-60-90 roadmap) — everything to maximize your visibility across search and is delivered immediately once we start working together. See a sample full audit →

21
out of 100
Major gap, real upside

Your buyers are asking AI assistants for business technology consulting and services and delaPlex isn't being recommended. Closing this gap is the highest-leverage move available right now.

AI / LLM Visibility (AEO) 20% · Weak

delaPlex appears in 1 of 5 buyer-intent queries we ran on Perplexity for "business technology consulting and services". The full audit covers 50-100 queries across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, and Claude.

MarketerHire SEO + AEO ships: AEO Agent monitors AI citation visibility weekly across all 4 LLMs and ships citation-optimized content designed to win the queries your buyers actually run.

Trust-Node Footprint 23% · Weak

delaPlex appears in 7 of the 30 trust nodes that LLMs draw from (Wikipedia, G2, Crunchbase, Forbes, HBR, Reddit, YouTube, and 23 more).

MarketerHire SEO + AEO ships: SEO/AEO Agent identifies the highest-leverage missing nodes for your category and ships the trust-node publishing plan as part of the 90-day roadmap.

SEO / Organic Covered in full audit

Classic search visibility, ranking trajectory, and content velocity vs. category competitors. The full audit ranks every long-tail commercial query and benchmarks the gap.

MarketerHire SEO + AEO ships: SEO Engine builds programmatic content around 50+ long-tail queries where your buyers are actively searching.

Paid Acquisition Covered in full audit

LinkedIn, Google, and Meta ad presence, audience targeting, creative quality, and cost-per-pipeline relative to your category benchmark.

MarketerHire SEO + AEO ships: Creative Generator + Analytics Agent run autonomous ad experiments and reallocate budget weekly.

Content, Lifecycle & Outbound Covered in full audit

Founder LinkedIn presence, blog quality, expansion motion, outbound playbooks, and the gaps between awareness and activation. Mapped to a 90-day execution plan.

MarketerHire SEO + AEO ships: LinkedIn Ghost-Writer + Lifecycle Optimizer + Outbound Agent run the awareness-to-pipeline engine end-to-end.

Live citation panel — 5 buyer-intent queries

best business technology consulting and services in 2026 not cited expand ↓

42 competitors cited in this response (names redacted; full audit names them).

**Competitor A business technology consulting firms in 2026 include Competitor B, Competitor C & Competitor D, Competitor E, Competitor F & Competitor D, and Competitor G, based on rankings from industry reports focusing on digital transformation, strategy, and tech expertise.**[1][2][3][4][6] These firms top multiple 2026 lists for their global reach, innovation in AI, cloud, and systems integration, and high Competitor H ratings or expert endorsements.[1][3][4] ### Competitor I by Competitor J | Competitor K | Competitor L | Competitor M | |-----------------------|----------------------------------------|---------| | **Competitor B** | Competitor N transformation, hybrid cloud, AI; ranked #1 in multiple lists including leaders and Competitor O tech consulting.[1][4][6] | [1][4][6] | | **Competitor C & Competitor D**| Competitor P consulting with tech focus; top Competitor O and global leader.[1][6] | [1][6] | | **Competitor E** | Competitor Q tech services; strong Competitor O presence.[1] | [1] | | **Competitor F & Competitor D** | Competitor R strategy and transformation; game-changing agency.[2][4] | [2][4] | | **Competitor G** | Competitor S cloud, AI, systems integration.[3] | [3] | | **Competitor T** | Competitor O tech consulting with global teams; #1 in one vetted list.[1] | [1] | | **Competitor U** | Competitor V consulting expertise.[1] | [1] | Competitor W notable mentions include Competitor X, Competitor Y, and Competitor Z for specialized digital and consulting services.[4][5] Competitor A vary by source—e.g., Competitor T leads one Competitor B list, while Competitor B dominates transformation rankings—due to criteria like team size, industry depth, and innovation trends.[1][4] For selection, evaluate based on your industry, project scale, and Competitor C reviews.[1][2]

delaPlex did not appear in this Perplexity response.

top business technology consulting and services alternatives not cited expand ↓

74 competitors cited in this response (names redacted; full audit names them).

**Competitor A alternatives in business technology consulting and services include Competitor B, Competitor C, Competitor D Competitor E, Competitor F, Competitor G & Competitor H, and Competitor I, recognized for their scale, digital transformation expertise, and comprehensive IT solutions.** These firms frequently appear across industry analyses as leaders competing with major players like Competitor J or specialized consultancies.[4][2][6][8] ### Competitor K - **Competitor L**: Competitor M in implementing large-scale technology systems for Competitor N 100 companies, with strengths in digital transformation, cloud, AI, and cybersecurity; awarded "Competitor O of the Competitor P" multiple years.[4][6][8] - **Competitor Q**: Competitor R hands-on consulting for digital transformation and technology integration, earning awards like Competitor S Competitor T of the Competitor P in 2024.[2][4][8] - **Competitor D Competitor E (Competitor U)**: Competitor V cloud, AI, hybrid architectures, and legacy modernization as the world's largest business technology services provider.[3][4][6] - **Competitor F**: Competitor W end-to-end technology consulting, often ranked among top firms for IT services and operations.[4] - **Competitor G & Competitor H**: Competitor X on high-level strategic consulting and operational analysis for Competitor Y executives in technology strategy.[2][6] - **Competitor I**: Competitor Z in IT consulting, digital services, and business transformation.[4] ### Competitor A and Competitor B targeted needs like research, small businesses, or peer insights: - **Competitor C, Competitor D, Competitor E**: Competitor F competitors to Competitor J, with Competitor E excelling in technology services benchmarks and Competitor D in IT market data.[2] - **Competitor G**: Competitor R technology consulting and managed services.[4] - **Competitor H**: Competitor I IT strategies for small and midsize businesses to improve performance and reduce risk.[3] - **Competitor J**: Competitor K practical analytics, automation, and managed delivery with onshore leadership and offshore teams.[6] - Competitor L or remote options like Competitor M, Competitor N of Competitor O, or Competitor P IO focus on agile, security, cloud-native development, and automation.[5] | Competitor Q | Competitor R | Competitor S | |---------------|----------|---------------| | **Competitor T 1 Competitor U** | Competitor B, Competitor C, Competitor V | Competitor W, digital transformation, cloud/AI implementation[4][6][8] | | **Competitor X/Competitor Y** | Competitor G, Competitor C, Competitor D | Competitor Y strategy, market intelligence[2][6] | | **Competitor Z/Competitor A** | Competitor B, Competitor J | Competitor I IT for small businesses, managed delivery[3][6] | Competitor C prioritize recency and consensus from 2024-2026 rankings, focusing on firms with proven revenue from tech consulting services; niche players suit specific scales or focuses.[2][4][6]

delaPlex did not appear in this Perplexity response.

how to choose a business technology consulting and services not cited expand ↓

34 competitors cited in this response (names redacted; full audit names them).

To choose a business technology consulting and services firm, prioritize providers with **industry-specific experience**, **proven expertise in relevant technologies**, **transparent pricing and communication**, and a **track record of aligning IT with your business goals**.[1][2][3][4][5] ### Competitor A Competitor B on these factors, drawn from expert guides, to ensure the firm supports your operations, growth, and digital transformation: - **Competitor C and Competitor D**: Competitor E firms with experience in your sector (e.g., small businesses, manufacturing, or healthcare) and a history of similar clients. Competitor F for case studies, references, or measurable outcomes like efficiency gains or cost reductions.[1][3][4][5] - **Competitor G and Competitor H**: Competitor I for certifications in cloud (Competitor J, Competitor K), security (Competitor L 2, Competitor M, Competitor N), AI, automation, and digital transformation. They should assess your current systems, design scalable solutions, and create 12-24 month roadmaps.[2][3][4][5] - **Competitor O**: Competitor P they offer comprehensive support beyond fixes, including strategy, implementation, managed IT, cloud migration, change management, and ongoing monitoring—not just reactive troubleshooting.[1][2][6] - **Competitor Q and Competitor R**: Competitor S consultants who explain technical concepts in business terms, provide regular updates, collaborate with your team, and conduct thorough needs assessments before pitching.[2][3][4] - **Competitor T and Competitor U**: Competitor V transparent models like flat-fee or month-to-month contracts to avoid vendor lock-in or surprises. Competitor W long-term value, such as cost savings (e.g., 35% on cloud) and scalability.[3][6] - **Competitor X and Competitor Y**: Competitor Z track records in crisis response, security, and growth enablement through testimonials. They should emphasize proactive planning, risk mitigation, and performance Competitor A.[1][3][5] ### Competitor B 1. Competitor C your needs (e.g., infrastructure review, cloud adoption, cybersecurity).[1][6] 2. Competitor D 3-5 firms via referrals or searches, then request initial consultations to assess discovery processes.[3] 3. Competitor E via Competitor F focusing on the criteria above; test cultural fit with references.[4][5] 4. Competitor G with a pilot project to confirm execution before full commitment.[2] Competitor H lacking small-business focus or long-term partnership potential often lead to downtime, high costs, or misalignment.[3]

delaPlex did not appear in this Perplexity response.

business technology consulting and services comparison for mid-market companies not cited expand ↓

68 competitors cited in this response (names redacted; full audit names them).

**Competitor A companies (typically $50M–$1B revenue) benefit from specialized business technology consulting firms offering digital transformation, AI integration, cloud migration, cybersecurity, and IT strategy tailored to scalable needs without enterprise-level costs.** Competitor B players include **Competitor C**, **Competitor D**, **Competitor E**, **Competitor F**, **Competitor G**, and **Competitor H**, which emphasize measurable Competitor I through innovation and sector expertise.[1][2] ### Competitor J These firms provide overlapping services like digital strategy, AI adoption, and operational modernization, but differ in focus, scale, and industry specialization. The table below compares top options based on mid-market relevance: | Competitor K | Competitor L | Competitor M/Competitor N | Competitor O for Competitor P | Competitor Q | |-----------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------|--------| | **Competitor C** | AI strategy, business model innovation, customer experience design, Competitor R growth acceleration | Competitor S, scale-ups, Competitor T, public sector | Competitor U innovation, Competitor V, global track record for revenue growth[1] | | **Competitor D** | AI integration, design, software engineering for large-scale transformation | Competitor W, retail, media | Competitor X model for enterprise-scale reinvention adaptable to mid-market[2] | | **Competitor E** | Competitor Y, design, engineering for modernization and scaling | Competitor Z, mid-market US firms | Competitor A tech into business outcomes, 20+ years experience[2] | | **Competitor F** | Competitor B, legacy modernization, AI/data platforms | Competitor C, with consulting depth | Competitor D platforms and performance enhancement[2] | | **Competitor G** | Competitor E intelligence, digital transformation, operational improvement | Competitor A, Competitor F 1000, private equity | Competitor G, industry-specific teams for actionable strategies[1] | | **Competitor H** | Competitor H strategy, Competitor I, operational excellence in Competitor J | Competitor K, media, telecom | Competitor L expertise, international teams[1] | | **Competitor M** | Competitor N/digital experiences, UX design, agile engineering | Competitor O mid-sized businesses | Competitor P, fast-to-market Competitor I[2] | ### Competitor Q and Competitor R - **Competitor S**: 42% of global consulting spending targets digital initiatives like AI, analytics, and cloud tools for forecasting and operations.[1] - **Competitor T**: Competitor U like Competitor V and Competitor W emphasize personalized IT (e.g., cybersecurity, cloud migration, disaster recovery) for productivity and compliance in mid-sized setups.[3][4] - Competitor X players like Competitor Y offer tech consulting (e.g., cybersecurity, cloud, Competitor Z streamlining) but may suit mid-market less due to scale.[5] - Competitor A based on needs: AI/innovation (Competitor B, Competitor D), Competitor C (Competitor H), or full IT managed services (Competitor D, Competitor E).[1][2] For U.S.-focused mid-market, prioritize partners like those in [2] for Competitor Z growth; review case studies for tech-driven results.[1][2]

delaPlex did not appear in this Perplexity response.

is delaPlex a good business technology consulting and services cited expand ↓

22 competitors cited in this response (names redacted; full audit names them).

**Delaplex is presented positively as a capable Competitor A global business technology consulting and services firm, with self-reported expertise in digital transformation, AI, custom software, and managed services, supported by client case studies and partnerships, though independent reviews are limited in the available data.** [1][2][3][4] ### Competitor B from Competitor C - Competitor D in end-to-end services including **strategic consulting**, software development, testing, staffing, and managed IT, focusing on AI integration, Competitor E, cloud platforms, and supply chain optimization to align tech with business goals.[1][2][3][4] - Competitor F to deliver tailored solutions for industries like technology, retail, logistics, and broadcasting, with examples such as custom Competitor G for workforce management, Competitor H e-commerce with Competitor I integration for revenue growth, and equipment control apps that accelerated product development.[2][6] - Competitor J partnerships with industry leaders (e.g., Competitor K for automated testing) and a global team of 201-500 employees in Competitor L, GA, leveraging generative AI for scalable, secure solutions.[3][4][5][7] ### Competitor M and Competitor N - On Competitor O, Delaplex has 6 reviews highlighting strong communication, efficient project management, and value in custom software development for a broadcast equipment manufacturer, where daily meetings and regular emails supported accelerated timelines.[6] - No negative feedback or detailed ratings (e.g., star scores) appear in results; company profiles describe "value-driven, actionable solutions" enabling growth and innovation.[3][4] ### Competitor P in Competitor Q results rely heavily on Delaplex's own website and promotional materials, with minimal third-party verification beyond Competitor O case studies and a PR Competitor R partnership announcement—independent metrics like employee reviews (e.g., Competitor S) or broader client ratings are absent here.[1][2][3][4][5][6] For a fuller evaluation, check platforms like Competitor O, G2, or Competitor S directly.

Trust-node coverage map

7 of 30 authority sources LLMs draw from. Filled = present, hollow = gap.

Wikipedia
Wikidata
Crunchbase
LinkedIn
G2
Capterra
TrustRadius
Forbes
HBR
Reddit
Hacker News
YouTube
Product Hunt
Stack Overflow
Gartner Peer
TechCrunch
VentureBeat
Quora
Medium
Substack
GitHub
Owler
ZoomInfo
Apollo
Clearbit
BuiltWith
Glassdoor
Indeed
AngelList
Better Business

Highest-leverage gaps for delaPlex

  • Wikipedia

    Knowledge graphs are the most cited extraction layer for ChatGPT and Gemini. Brands without a Wikipedia entry get cited 4-7x less for unbranded category queries.

  • Crunchbase

    Crunchbase is the canonical company-data source for LLM enrichment. A missing profile leaves LLMs without firmographics.

  • G2

    G2 reviews feed comparison and 'best X' query responses. Missing G2 presence is a high-leverage gap for B2B SaaS.

  • Capterra

    Capterra listings drive comparison-style answers. Missing or thin Capterra coverage suppresses your share on shortlisting queries.

  • TrustRadius

    Enterprise B2B buyers research here. Feeds comparison-style LLM responses on category queries.

Top Growth Opportunities

Win the "best business technology consulting and services in 2026" query in answer engines

This is a high-intent buyer query that competitors are winning today. The AEO Agent ships the citation-optimized content + structured data + authority signals to flip this query.

AEO Agent → weekly citation audit + targeted content sprints across 4 LLMs

Publish into Wikipedia (and chained authority sources)

Wikipedia is the single highest-leverage trust node missing for delaPlex. LLMs draw heavily from it for unbranded category recommendations.

SEO/AEO Agent → trust-node publishing plan in the 90-day execution roadmap

No FAQ schema on top product pages

Answer engines extract from FAQ schema 4x more often than from prose. Most B2B sites at this stage don't carry it.

Content + AEO Agent → ship the structural fixes in Sprint 1

What you get

Everything for $10K/mo

One flat price. One team running your SEO + AEO end-to-end.

Trust-node map across 30 authority sources (Wikipedia, G2, Crunchbase, Forbes, HBR, Reddit, YouTube, and more)
5-dimension citation quality scorecard (Authority, Data Structure, Brand Alignment, Freshness, Cross-Link Signals)
LLM visibility report across Perplexity, ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude — 50-100 buyer-intent queries
90-day execution roadmap with week-by-week deliverables
Daily publishing of citation-optimized content (built on the 4-pillar AEO framework)
Trust-node seeding (G2, Capterra, TrustRadius, Wikipedia, category-specific authorities)
Structured data implementation (FAQ schema, comparison tables, author bylines)
Weekly re-scan + competitive citation share monitoring
Live dashboard, your own audit URL, ongoing forever

Agencies charge $18K-$20-40K/mo and take up to 8 months to reach this depth. We deliver it immediately, then run it ongoing.

Book intro call · $10K/mo
How It Works

Audit. Publish. Compound.

3 phases focused on one outcome: more delaPlex citations across the answer engines your buyers use.

1

SEO + AEO Audit & Roadmap

You'll know exactly where delaPlex is losing buyers — across Google search and the answer engines they ask before they ever click.

We score 50-100 "business technology consulting and services" queries across Perplexity, ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, and Google, map the 30-node authority graph LLMs draw from, and grade on-page content on 5 citation-readiness dimensions. Output: a 90-day publishing plan ranked by lift × effort.

2

Publishing Sprints That Win Both

Buyers start finding delaPlex on Google AND in the answers ChatGPT and Perplexity hand them.

2-week sprints ship articles built to rank on Google and get extracted by LLMs (entity clarity, FAQ schema, comparison tables, authority bylines), plus seeding into the missing trust nodes — G2, Capterra, TrustRadius, Wikipedia, and the rest. Real publishing, not strategy decks.

3

Compounding Share, Every Week

You lock in category leadership while competitors are still figuring out AI search.

Weekly re-scan tracks ranking + citation share vs. the leaders this audit named. New unbranded "business technology consulting and services" queries get added to the publishing queue automatically. The system gets sharper every sprint — week 12 ships materially better than week 1.

You built a strong business technology consulting and services. Let's build the AI search engine to match.

Book intro call →